 Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
My Links
Global Warming Causes Everything
A democrat that doesn't make the veins in my neck explode every time she opens her mouth.
Analog
Baen Books
Brainchild of a Conservative Anomaly
Lesson along the scenic route through purgatory
How Democrats can get away with this bullshit astounds even me!
BBC
Billings Gazette
Big Lizards
Brain Terminal
Colorado Public Radio
Clinton Iraq 1998
Chaos Manor
Democrats vs. Republicans on race issues
Drudge Report
Fox News
Jerry Doyle
Google News
Junk Science.com
Just Barking Mad
Little Green Footballs
The Montana Misanthrope
Montana Politics
Neal Boortz
NO PC Forums
Opinion Journal
Q and O Newsroom
Rabid Sanity
Random Nuclear Strikes
Reference Desk
Sirius
The American Thinker
Thoolou's Lair
VOA News
Victor Davis Hanson
World Tribune
Zombie Hall of Shame (not for the faint of heart)
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
|
| Review and Comment on the News 3/31/06 |
| 03.31.06 (7:29 am) [edit] |
Bowling for Concubines: Whilst filming a new Docuprop flick, film maker Michael Moore smuggled enough material to make two dirty bombs past airport security in one of his folds. He plans to cut and paste Bush (complete with bloody coke trails streaming from his nose) into the scene as a baggage screener. He also found the remote he lost in 1997. Lake Tahoe bears the brunt of Global Warming:

An unending series of March snowstorms pasted the Sierra in white, with one Lake Tahoe ski resort reporting more snowfall than during any other month over the last 35 years. At Alpine Meadows, the resort received more than 16 feet of snow at its base lodge since March 1. Midway up the mountain, more than 22 feet fell, resort representatives said Wednesday.
Damn you Mr. President!! Sign Kyoto now!! Save us! Iran's nuclear weapons program proceeding apace.
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Three strong earthquakes and several aftershocks reduced villages to rubble in western Iran early Friday, killing at least 66 people and injuring about 1,200 others, officials said. At least 13 tremors jolted the mountainous region throughout the night, Tehran University's Geophysics Institute said.
From Boortz.com: Cynthia McKinney (D) Leftist, appears to have a reputation for punching and shoving white folks she considers beneath her:
Now we're hearing reports from others on Capitol Hill that Cynthia McKinney has a reputation for treating people whom she considers beneath her status with disdain ... and especially white people whom she considers to be beneath her. One former staff member on the House International Relations committee, Richard Stafford, is now talking about an incident where McKinney struck him and pushed him aside when he tried to stop her from entering a closed-door, members-only meeting with a friend and two small children. He wanted to press charges then, but figured it would end his career.
It's Society's fault. If I'm picturing the right person, I always thought she was kinda cute for a crazed, conspiracy driven leftist.

Then again when she sports a hairdo like Phil's (pictured above) it's hard to tell.
Some leftists probably feel the same way about Michelle Malkin. More of the same in Gaza: BOOM! Antarctica's temperature is now that of Sub Saharan Africa. All because of one man...
"Kill me! Kill me!"
The 20th hijacker appears to be trying to get executed. Those 72 virgins are probably starting to look good about now.

Give the man his wish, it'll probably end up like this. Hopefully. Cheney's Halliburton Orbital Laser Platform test: Success!! Insensitive? Yes. Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Up in Smoke:
Nairobi, Kenya (AHN) – Police say an incinerator, where one of Africa’s biggest narcotics seizure was set ablaze earlier today, has exploded. No one was hurt, but the eight-hour process is now delayed with only one incinerator left to burn 1.1 metric tons of cocaine. The campaign is aimed at dispelling rumors that some of the drugs were leaked into the international market. Suspicions arose almost immediately after police seized the $88 million worth of coke in Dec ‘04.Foreign journalists, diplomats, members of the judiciary and suspects previously arrested for drug trafficking are on site to witness the burning. Officials say no one should be affected by the smoke. (Yeah, right)! Director of public prosecutions, Keriako Tobiko, says the operation is running smoothly despite the blast.
There are probably some Zebra's who's stripes are about to change color. The blaze will probably contribute to Global Warming. Condoleeza Rice fends off liberal PC talking points:
In a major foreign policy speech, Ms Rice said the US had no desire to be the world's jailer, referring to the detention of inmates at Guantanamo Bay.
Name a war where there weren't thousands of errors. Canada's liberals vent their frustrations in hot, new video game..
Prime Minister Stephen Harper should hope life doesn't imitate art. A new top-selling video game kicks off with a bang -- a few bangs, actually -- with the assassination of the Canadian prime minister, sparking continental turmoil that only an elite group of soldiers can undo.
Reminds me of the book released in '04 regarding how to assassinate Bush. As long as the target is a conservative, it's fair game, even celebrated as free speech, target a liberal, it's hate speech. Just an observation. Any spelling errors in today's Review are the intellectual property of Barbra Striesand. Until Monday.
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Former FISA Judges: Bush within the law / Leftist slaps Captiol Hill Police Officer / Tough Talk |
| 03.30.06 (8:21 am) [edit] |
The "Ushering in a long dark night of fascism" crowd needs to take a look at this:
A panel of former Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judges yesterday told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that President Bush did not act illegally when he created by executive order a wiretapping program conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA). T he five judges testifying before the committee said they could not speak specifically to the NSA listening program without being briefed on it, but that a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act does not override the president's constitutional authority to spy on suspected international agents under executive order. "If a court refuses a FISA application and there is not sufficient time for the president to go to the court of review, the president can under executive order act unilaterally, which he is doing now," said Judge Allan Kornblum, magistrate judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida and an author of the 1978 FISA Act. "I think that the president would be remiss exercising his constitutional authority by giving all of that power over to a statute." T he judges, however, said Mr. Bush's choice to ignore established law regarding foreign intelligence gathering was made "at his own peril," because ultimately he will have to answer to Congress and the Supreme Court if the surveillance was found not to be in the best interests of national security. J udge Kornblum said before the 1978 FISA law, foreign surveillance was done by executive order and the law itself was altered by the orders of Presidents Ford, Carter and Reagan. I t has been three months since President Bush said publicly that the NSA was listening to phone conversations between suspected terrorists abroad and domestically. The actions raised concerns from Congress and civil liberties groups about domestic spying, but the judges said that given new threats from terrorists and new communications technologies, the FISA law should be changed to give the president more latitude. S en. Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania Republican and committee chairman, called the hearing to get advice on his bill that would expand FISA to codify less stringent rules on wiretapping of domestic phone conversations with suspected foreign terrorists and include new technologies like the Internet and satellite communications. S en. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat, said the Congress should pass new legislation to ease existing restrictions under FISA. H owever, we should not rush to give the administration new powers it has not deigned to request, based on concerns it has not articulated," Mr. Leahy said. T he panel of judges unanimously agreed that the law should have been changed before now to deal with new threats from terrorists and new communications technologies, a point made by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat. I t is confusing that if you take something off of a satellite it is legal, but if you take it off of a wiretap it's not, she said. We need to include new technology.
Nice try Russ....
Cynthia McKinney (D) Leftist, slaps a Capitol Hill Police Officer:
Here is the way it was reported to have happened. Cynthia is entering one of the House office buildings. It wasn't the building in which her office is located. She was not wearing the lapel pin that identifies her as a member of congress. She exercises her privilege of walking around the metal detectors. The police officer doesn't recognize her and goes after her. That's his job. When he (chose one) (a) place his hand on her shoulder; or (b) grabbed her arm, she turned around and (a) hit, (b) punched (c) slapped him in his (a) face (b) chest with (a) her open hand (b) her fist (c) her cell phone.
How long before this becomes an impeachable offense, conducted by the Bush Administration's shock troops as further evidence of "the long dark night of fascism"?
Democrats get tough on National Security...4 1/2 years after 9/11:

Nanci Pelosi, unblinking, shiny and clad in a red, white and blue necklace of small balloons, said this:
Pelosi, D-Calif., said Democrats were providing a fresh strategy--"one that is strong and smart, which understands the challenges America faces in a post 9/11 world, and one that demonstrates that Democrats are the party of real national security."
I'm not going to laugh, I'm really not.......
Scenes I'd like to see: GITMO Demands met.
|
|
1 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/29/06 |
| 03.29.06 (11:39 am) [edit] |
Moussaoui may be on a one way trip to 'Ol Sparky, since Lethal Injection is inhumane and may cause a boo boo.
There was no letup in the prosecution's insistence that the 37-year-old Frenchman could have prevented the hijacked plane strikes on New York and Washington in 2001, as closing arguments in the death penalty trial started. "Zacarias Moussaoui came to this country to kill as many Americans as he could. In this trial you have heard from the defendant himself that is exactly what he did," prosecutor David Raskin told the jury.
Of course he won't be executed until 2080. By that time Mike Farrel should be well over one hundred and thirty. Abramoff get six years. I've heard more libe rals clamoring for the death penalty for Abramoff than I ever have Moussaoui. Priorities and perspective I guess. From my perspective it's always been this way...
In a (perhaps) historic shift, more Americans now consider themselves Democrats than Republicans, the Gallup organization revealed today.
Nothing new to me. I can count the republicans I know on two fingers. Me, and that other guy... Liberia's Charles "Chuck" Taylor in deep doo doo. Ah! The French! Now they want free food. Illegal wiretapping by democrats.
A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that Rep. Jim McDermott violated federal law by turning over an illegally taped telephone call to reporters nearly a decade ago. In a 2-1 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld a lower court ruling that McDermott violated the rights of House Majority Leader John Boehner, who was heard on the 1996 call involving former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
McDermott is probably screaming his damn fool, florid nosed, hypocrite head off about the NSA program. Fucker. Notice how his (McDerm ott's) party affiliation is not mentioned in the opening paragraph. In fact, maybe they use the word "Rep." so some gullible folks will think he is a republican. I know, it's paranoid. Hitler's Propaganda Minister resigns in Reichstag shake-up. Karl Rove (spelled with a Nazi-like "K" instead of the more soft, pleasing looking"C") is still at large. Senate to Lobbyists: Starve. Talking in your sleep? Be careful.
An Indian Muslim man has reportedly been ordered to separate from his wife after saying 'I divorce thee' in his sleep. Aftab Ansari was told to leave Sohela, his wife of 11 years, after he said ‘talaq’ - the Arabic equivalent of 'I divorce thee' - three times while asleep.
Hitchens: Our soldiers were greeted as liberators:
Christopher Hitchens was on top of his game as usual in debunking some of the myths about Iraq that have pervaded the national consciousness via the media: Matthews was running through a litany of what he termed "strike-outs" for the Bush administration in Iraq. When he got to "strikes out on the fact that we were going to be greeted as liberators," Hitchens interrupted: HITCHENS: No, no. We were greeted as liberators. I saw it myself.
MATTHEWS: The pictures, yeah.
HITCHENS: No, no, I was there. I saw it myself, many many times. American soldiers and British soldiers were greeted by hundreds of thousands of people with real joy. I saw it myself. I can't believe people say it didn't happen."
While America slept:
A recent poll has shown that Americans are more concerned about medical care than they are about the possibility of another terrorist attack on their country. This would go a long way toward explaining why President Bush's approval numbers are so low. Bush is focused on the war on terror; on protecting this country from the jihadist goals of Islam. Americans, being Americans, have noted that there has not been an attack on their country since 9/11, and therefore the threat of a terrorist attack is all but over and we're all safe. Now it's time for the government to do something to relieve them of the onerous responsibility of providing for your own medial care. After all, your health and your medical care is the responsibility of either your employer or the government, right? Because of this attitude socialized medicine is all but inevitable in this country, and you aren't going to like it even one little bit.
I read recently that in Canada, doctors are arguing before the Canadian Supreme Court to privatize Canada's Health Care system. Apparently, people are dying waiting in line to get treated....
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/28/06 / Gremlins ate my post.... |
| 03.28.06 (8:19 am) [edit] |
|
I tried to do a review today but after two attempts the fucking Gremlins wiped out my post. I had a bunch of good stuff too. So, I will post a mindless shot of a woman in a bikini on a beach:
Shit, that won't even work. How about John Cleese in drag:

Jeezus! At least something worked. One hour of my life wasted............
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| John Kerry's Rider / Boortz nails it....... |
| 03.27.06 (11:48 am) [edit] |
Much was made last week about Cheney's hotel room demands, (room 68 degrees, Sprite and the Fox News Channel), well apparently the rider for one John Forbes Kerry (champion of the little guy) and his doting wife Ketchup (or is it Catsup) magnate, Turraza Heinz "Hank" Kerry make Cheney's look rather spartan by comparison....
MARCH 27--In the spirit of bipartisanship, The Smoking Gun today extends our review of political tour riders across the aisle to examine Senator John Kerry, whose list of demands (and that of his wife) makes Sprite-lovin' Vice President Dick Cheney look like a travelin' rube. The riders for Kerry and Teresa Heinz Kerry were compiled during the last presidential campaign and were circulated by the Democratic candidate's advance team, a member of which provided them to TSG. The documents (one is actually labeled "Confidential") detail Kerry's food favorites and drop the bombshell that the Massachusetts senator "hates celery." Oddly, Kerry avoids all things tomato, the fruit behind his wife's nine-figure ketchup fortune. His hotel rider notes that the "phone and the ability to order movies in suite should always be turned on and ready to go for JK's arrival," things that make him "very happy." The more detailed rider, of course, belongs to the politician's spouse, who likes celery and snoozing on a "Heavenly Bed" in a Starwood hotel that has "good air circulation." She also digs flax bread, stone crabs, peanut power butter, filet mignon with veggies, and bottled water apparently run through a "reverse osmosis filter." Why are we not surprised
Boortz nails it here:
The Washington and New York press corps smell this possible Democratic victory. The vast majority of them will be voting Democratic, and a Democratic takeover of the House of Representatives is at the top of their wish list. Perhaps the only people who desire a Democratic majority in the House come next January more than the Democrats themselves, would be the DC and New York press corps. So, if you want to see some good news from Iraq on the front pages, it will have to be stupendously good news indeed ... the opening of the Baghdad Disney World might make it above the fold. Democrats are going to keep doing what they've been doing for the past three years, putting Democratic political fortunes ahead of American success in Iraq, and the media is going to continue to provide cover.
My sentiments echoed here: Let's give credit where it is due. Democrats and their media friends have done a spectacular job of creating a false reality in the minds of many Americans. Many Americans are now living in a world of make believe. They've been made to believe many things that just ain't so, and to discredit things that are. The Democrats in elected office and in the media made them believe that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. He did. They made the voters believe that there was no connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda. There was. The left-wing media/political machine made the people believe that there was no connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. The connection has been shown. The American people, thanks to the constant drumbeat of Democrats in the press and in public office, believe that there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11. There was. Republicans are floundering. They're watching the polls slide while they essentially do nothing. There is not one single bold Republican initiative before the voters that can arouse voter passions. Nothing. Seven months and counting.
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/26/06 |
| 03.26.06 (7:53 am) [edit] |
Global Warming: We're all going to die. Panic wins the day as I stare out my window at 4 inches of freshly fallen snow and it's almost April, like I do every year. See previous review for the facts.

Scalia: A man of imminent good sense:
"War is war, and it has never been the case that when you captured a combatant you have to give them a jury trial in your civil courts," he says on a tape of the talk reviewed by NEWSWEEK. "Give me a break." Challenged by one audience member about whether the Gitmo detainees don't have protections under the Geneva or human-rights conventions, Scalia shot back: "If he was captured by my army on a battlefield, that is where he belongs. I had a son on that battlefield and they were shooting at my son and I'm not about to give this man who was captured in a war a full jury trial. I mean it's crazy."
Not to mention I've read that if they don't wear uniforms they aren't subject to the Geneva Convention. You can't get lemon pepper fish or rice pilaf under the Geneva Convention anyway so these guys are better off under America's Evil Imperialistic Thumb. Who (or Whom) would you rather have running the War on Terror? Scalia? Or this chisled armchair terror warrior?

Maybe she could spell America's way to victory in the War on Terror. Unfortunately, that is the choice we are faced with in November. I think the latter's mindset will win the day. That's how the republicans should run the campaign, Streisand or Scalia? You decide. That pretty much says it right there.
Ah! The French! "They shout about love but when push comes to shove."
The row over the CPE (First Job Contract), which allows employers to fire people under 26 without giving a reason during a two-year trial period, is one of the biggest crises in Villepin's 10-month administration.
Shouldn't an employer be able to fire anyone without giving a reason? I know that sounds cruel but if it's their business.... Navy Ship Collides with Oil Tanker: Don't worry kids, no oil was spilled, put away the riot gear. Oh my God!! RIP: Buck Owens is dead!! His funding was probably cut....

L.A. March: France's influence spreads, freeloaders have rights.
Thousands of immigration advocates marched through downtown Los Angeles in one of the largest demonstrations for any cause in recent U.S. history. More than 500,000 protesters - demanding that Congress abandon attempts to make illegal immigration a felony and to build more walls along the border - surprised police who estimated the crowd size using aerial photographs and other techniques, police Cmdr. Louis Gray Jr. said.
Bigger than most anti- war demonstrations? If not as many people showed up as anticipated would the media dub it "quiet disapproval"? Christian allowed to keep his head: Case dismissed.
An Afghan court on Sunday dismissed a case against a man who converted from Islam to Christianity because of a lack of evidence and he will be released soon, officials said.

Lack of evidence?? He admitted it for crying out loud. I was going to say "for Chrissakes" but I held my tongue. Literally.
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/24/06 |
| 03.24.06 (7:47 am) [edit] |
New York Times Poster Child for Hurricane Katrina (read Bush) victims is a sniveling welfare cheat.

The police arrested a Queens woman yesterday, saying she had falsely claimed to be a victim of Hurricane Katrina and had taken thousands of dollars in aid from state and federal agencies.
The woman, Donna Fenton, 37, was charged by Brooklyn prosecutors with several counts of welfare fraud and grand larceny, the latest additions to a long record of fraud, arrests and legal disputes stretching from Mississippi to New York. Ms. Fenton was the subject of an article in The New York Times on March 8, more than a month after Brooklyn prosecutors, prompted by suspicious officials at the city's welfare agency, began investigating her.
Nice. The fact that she's a welfare cheat is probably Bush's fault as well. I don't want to talk about this anymore, I cannot discuss it without flying into an obscenity laced tirade. The media isn't biased, nothing to see here, move along. Ah! The French! Sea Levels could rise 1,000 ft. in the next hour or 100 ft. in the next 20 years, or is it 20 ft. in the next 100 years? All because of Bush....
I want my country back:
DNC Chairman Howard Dean, locked his babysitter out of the house last week and ate two two pounds jars of mayonnaise after trying to milk his Mother-in Law in an act of Civil Disobedience say sources close to the former presidential candidate. Tammy Bruce weighs in on the story that won't go away, which I've discussed twicely or thricely already.
Superb post about the current Global Warming hysteria at JamesP.Hogan.com:
The February 21, 2006 issue of Benny Peiser's Cambridge Conference Network newsletter (subscribe free) carries an article entitled "The Anthropogenic Global Warming Doctrine" by Dr Gerrit J. van der Lingen, an "independent scientist," published in the Newsletter of the Geological Society of New Zealand, November 2005. Dr. van der Lingen explains the term as meaning: "not being dependent for one's livelihood on research funding from the public purse controlled by politicians for whom the AGW scare is a godsend." Some quotes: "I have been collecting some of the insults levelled at AGW sceptics: cash-amplified flat-earth pseudo-scientists; the carbon cartel; villains; refuseniks lobby; polluters; a powerful and devious enemy; deniers; profligates; crank scientists. The list is endless. I remember the reaction of a Canadian scientist who dared to ask critical questions at a meeting on global warming. He was totally taken aback by the virulent reaction, "it was as if I was back in the Middle Ages and had denied the Virgin Birth". A common slur is also that all sceptics are in the pockets of the oil industry." "The global warming debate has left the realm of science a long time ago. It has become totally politicised. Any scientific criticism is not met with a scientific response, but with name-calling and a stepping up of the scare tactics." "A favourite ploy by AGW alarmists is to repeat ad infinitem that the science about AGW has been settled and that there is consensus among scientists that it is happening and that it will have cataclysmic consequences for our planet. People using these consensus arguments forget that scientific truth is not determined by consensus. But apart from being unscientific, the consensus argument is also a myth." "Unfortunately, none of us [independent scientists] is 'in the pockets of the oil industry'. Unfortunately, because I could do with some extra pocket money." [Me too -- JPH] "McIntyre and McKitrick found serious flaws and deliberate manipulation of data in the methods used by MBH98 to obtain their Hockey Stick. They even found that the statistical methods used by MBH98 always produces a hockey stick shaped graph, even when random numbers are used." "The reason why the Hockey Stick is so important is the fact that it tries to do away with the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age (and further back with the Dark Ages Cold Period and the Roman Warm Period). Those natural climate fluctuations are an embarrassment to the hypothesis that mankind is mainly to blame for the present warming. In its first Scientific Assessment Report (1990), the IPCC still had a temperature graph showing the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age. It is now clear in the 2001 report that the IPCC has deliberately eliminated these natural climate fluctuations with sleight of hand." "It does not matter how often independent scientists point out that CO2 is not a pollutant but a plant fertilizer and an essential ingredient for life on earth, they keep repeating this mantra." "It is clear that the politicising of climate science has resulted in an abandoning of good scientific practice and ethics. Any critical scientific discussion of the science behind the AGW doctrine is shouted down, ridiculed or ostracised." "More studies are coming out about the role of the sun in climate change and several groups are revisiting the theory of greenhouse gases, especially the role of carbon dioxide . . ." Full text at www.nbr.co.nz/home/column_article.asp?id=14429&cid=18&a mp;cname=Opinion.
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Gratitude on display, from Drudge / Saddam and Osama wanted nothing to do with each other my ass!! |
| 03.23.06 (6:52 am) [edit] |
Gratitude: Christian Peace Activists rescued by Imperialist Tools (i.e. the good guys) in Military Operation......
(Three Western peace workers who were held hostage in Iraq for four months were rescued in a military operation today, two weeks after their American colleague was killed in captivity. The three men — James Loney, 41, and Harmeet Singh Sooden, 32, both from Canada; and Norman Kember, 74, of Britain — had been kidnapped last November along with the American man, Tom Fox, in Baghdad while working with the Chicago-based Christian Peacemaker Teams.) ...and in their press release these hapless shreds of sweetness and light describe their fellow crusaders against oppression (hostages) as having "been released unharmed." How's that for gratitude? Only having this to say about the military:
"We believe that the illegal occupation of Iraq by Multinational Forces is the root cause of the insecurity which led to this kidnapping and so much pain and suffering in Iraq. The occupation must end."
I'd throw them back. Fuckers.
Well, well it appears this story which I posted last week is not going away, so I will rerun it as well.....
"Osama Bin Laden Contact With Iraq" A newly released pre-war Iraqi document indicates that an official representative of Saddam Hussein's government met with Osama bin Laden in Sudan on February 19, 1995 after approval by Saddam Hussein. Bin Laden asked that Iraq broadcast the lectures of Suleiman al Ouda, a radical Saudi preacher, and suggested "carrying out joint operations against foreign forces" in Saudi Arabia. According to the document, Saddam's presidency was informed of the details of the meeting on March 4, 1995 and Saddam agreed to dedicate a program for them on the radio. The document states that further "development of the relationship and cooperation between the two parties to be left according to what's open (in the future) based on dialogue and agreement on other ways of cooperation." The Sudanese were informed about the agreement to dedicate the program on the radio. The report then states that "Saudi opposition figure" bin Laden had to leave Sudan in July 1996 after it was accused of harboring terrorists. It says information indicated he was in Afghanistan. "The relationship with him is still through the Sudanese. We're currently working on activating this relationship through a new channel in light of his current location," it states.
Maybe Stephen Hayes isn't such a whack after all.....
|
|
2 Comments
|
| |
| George W. Bush - Death Merchant... |
| 03.22.06 (12:43 pm) [edit] |
|
.....or is he? Found this interesting bit of information on Instapundit: WAR AND PEACE: Some interesting numbers: While every lost serviceman and servicewoman is certainly tragic and should be mourned, the actual statistics tell quite a different tale from the MSM and Democratic doom-and-gloom outlook. Comparing the numbers of lost US military personnel to past years, and past presidential terms, may even be a shock to supporters of the war. Take a look at the actual US Military Casualty figures since 1980. If you do the math, you wil find quite a few surpises. First of all, let's compare numbers of US Military personnel that died during the first term of the last four presidents. George W. Bush . . . . . 5187 (2001-2004) Bill Clinton . . . . . . . . . 4302 (1993-1996) George H.W. Bush . . . . 6223 (1989-1992) Ronald Reagan . . . . . . 9163 (1981-1984) Even during the (per MSM) utopic peacetime of Bill Clinton's term, we lost 4302 service personnel. H.W. Bush and Reagan actually lost significantly more personnel while never fighting an extensive war, much less a simulaltaneous war on two theaters (Iraq and Afghanistan). Even the dovish Carter lost more people duing his last year in office, in 1980 lost 2392, than W. has lost in any single year of his presidency. (2005 figures are not available but I would wager the numbers would be slightly higher than 2004.) In 2004, more soldiers died outside of Iraq and Afghanistan than died inside these two war zones (900 in these zones, 987 outside these zones). The reason is that there are usually a fair number that die every year in training accidents, as well as a small number of illness and suicide. Yet the MSM would make you think that US soldiers are dying at a high number in these zones, and at a significantly higher number than in past years or under past presidents. This is all simply outright lies and distortion. You'd think this would get more attention.
UPDATE: John Kluge emails: The guy at red state gets it about half right on military deaths. He is absolutely right that soldiers die in accidents and of natural causes when they are in garrison. What he doesn’t take into account is that the military was much larger under Carter, Reagan and Bush I than it has been under Clinton or Bush II. Clinton and Bush II are really the only two comparable numbers. Looking at those numbers, it appears that the Iraq, Afghanistan wars have resulted in an increase of 885 dead over what could have been expected through normal garrison operations in Bush II’s first term. That is not too bad when you consider that Bush has liberated two countries and fought a prolonged insurgency in both and that America lost over 1,000 dead in taking Vichy French North Africa in 1942 (that was before we even so much as fired a shot at the Germans).
Good point.
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Bush Press Conference / Oprah Dumbing Down Viewers? |
| 03.21.06 (12:48 pm) [edit] |
Sinister neo-conservative President George W. Bush, verbally bitchslapped former Woodrow Wilson housemaid turned DNC lickspittle, Helen (Hank) Thomas in a press conference today.
BUSH TAKES ON PRESS AND HELEN THOMAS TOO Tue Mar 21 2006 14:40:12 ET
Helen Thomas, who in January grumbled that President Bush was a “coward” for not calling on her at a press conference, today was granted a question for the first time in several years. The doyenne of the White House press corps, who once called Bush the worst president in U.S. history, seized her chance with gusto, essentially debating Bush instead of questioning him. Here's the transcript:
THE PRESIDENT: Helen. After that brilliant performance at the Grid Iron, I am -- (laughter.)
Q You're going to be sorry. (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: Well, then, let me take it back. (Laughter.)
Q I'd like to ask you, Mr. President, your decision to invade Iraq has caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis, wounds of Americans and Iraqis for a lifetime. Every reason given, publicly at least, has turned out not to be true. My question is, why did you really want to go to war? From the moment you stepped into the White House, from your Cabinet -- your Cabinet officers, intelligence people, and so forth -- what was your real reason? You have said it wasn't oil -- quest for oil, it hasn't been Israel, or anything else. What was it?
THE PRESIDENT: I think your premise -- in all due respect to your question and to you as a lifelong journalist -- is that -- I didn't want war. To assume I wanted war is just flat wrong, Helen, in all due respect --
Q Everything --
THE PRESIDENT: Hold on for a second, please.
Q -- everything I've heard --
THE PRESIDENT: Excuse me, excuse me. No President wants war. Everything you may have heard is that, but it's just simply not true. My attitude about the defense of this country changed on September the 11th. We -- when we got attacked, I vowed then and there to use every asset at my disposal to protect the American people. Our foreign policy changed on that day, Helen. You know, we used to think we were secure because of oceans and previous diplomacy. But we realized on September the 11th, 2001, that killers could destroy innocent life. And I'm never going to forget it. And I'm never going to forget the vow I made to the American people that we will do everything in our power to protect our people.
Part of that meant to make sure that we didn't allow people to provide safe haven to an enemy. And that's why I went into Iraq -- hold on for a second --
Q They didn't do anything to you, or to our country.
THE PRESIDENT: Look -- excuse me for a second, please. Excuse me for a second. They did. The Taliban provided safe haven for al Qaeda. That's where al Qaeda trained --
Q I'm talking about Iraq --
THE PRESIDENT: Helen, excuse me. That's where -- Afghanistan provided safe haven for al Qaeda. That's where they trained. That's where they plotted. That's where they planned the attacks that killed thousands of innocent Americans.
I also saw a threat in Iraq. I was hoping to solve this problem diplomatically. That's why I went to the Security Council; that's why it was important to pass 1441, which was unanimously passed. And the world said, disarm, disclose, or face serious consequences --
Q -- go to war --
THE PRESIDENT: -- and therefore, we worked with the world, we worked to make sure that Saddam Hussein heard the message of the world. And when he chose to deny inspectors, when he chose not to disclose, then I had the difficult decision to make to remove him. And we did, and the world is safer for it.
Q Thank you, sir. Secretary Rumsfeld -- (laughter.)
Q Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: You're welcome. (Laughter.) I didn't really regret it. I kind of semi-regretted it. (Laughter.)
Q -- have a debate.
THE PRESIDENT: That's right. Anyway, your performance at the Grid Iron was just brilliant -- unlike Holland's, was a little weak, but -- (laughter.)
Oprah's secret mind control techniques are turning elderly women and stay at home soccer moms into blithering idiots.
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Older women who say talk shows and soap operas are their favorite TV programs tend to score more poorly on tests of memory, attention and other cognitive skills, researchers reported Monday.

Oprah, pictured here with a prominent intellectual, is creating a giant army of zombified housewives, patiently awaiting instructions regarding an array of topics from low fat spongecake recipies to cattle mutilations and what books to read. An "Oprah Selection" carries a lot of weight amongst the "Oprahfied." Experts urge caution....
|
|
2 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/20/06 |
| 03.20.06 (5:32 am) [edit] |
Prince Charles was right, Global warming is a bigger threat than terrorism. America pounded with weaponized Climate Change.

Oh boy! Grab the popcorn, Hollywood Left overseer Susan Sarandon to play Cindy Sheehan in upcoming movie. Low protestor turnout on war anniversary is quiet disapproval, yeah that's it. NASA: Make it Cindy Sheehan will ya'? Or Chavez or George Clooney or Michael Moore or....
NASA, the American space agency, has unveiled plans for one of the largest rockets ever built to take a manned mission to the far side of the moon. It will ferry a mother ship and lunar lander into Earth orbit to link up with a smaller rocket carrying the crew. Once united they will head for the moon where the larger ship will remain in orbit after launching the lunar lander and crew.
How is the Iraq War going 3 years in? Is it a lost cause like many on the Left say? Or is it sweetness and light like some on the Right say? Well, like many things in life the truth lies somewhere in between:
Well, yesterday we hit the much-publicized 3 year anniversary of the invasion of Iraq and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If you believe the media, Iraq is a lost cause...a failed adventure that has erupted in civil war. The left's prescription for what's happening over there: we should just pull up our stakes and leave.
Naturally, this would be a mistake. Several hundred billion dollars and several thousand American lives would have been spent in vain. We would be turning over the keys to Iraq to Zarqawi and his bunch...ready to use their new country as a base for which to launch attacks on America and Israel. So we can't just leave. We pay the price now and accomplish our goals, or we pay a much higher price later.
The administration says things are going well in Iraq, that we're making progress. So who do you believe? As is almost always the case, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. No, Iraq is not in the grips of a civil war. In fact, the majority of the country is at peace. And yes, the country is vastly better off than they were under Saddam Hussein. Despite what you read, there is more electricity, clean water and schools now than there was 3 years ago, prior to the invasion.
Right now is a critical time in Iraq, as a new government is formed. Things could have been done differently and better after the invasion. Things may well have gone better if the coalition had secured the support of France, Germany and Russia, and if Democrats at home had not been so determined to destroy Bush at virtually any price. I believe, though, that America is safer because George Bush invaded Iraq and overthrew Saddam Hussein. If we had not gone in there, Saddam would now be presiding over a government that was a state sponsor of terrorism, was flush with cash from illicit oil profits and working on a nuclear weapon.
Donkey and Drunkard? But Bush is a republican, I thought Chavez may have been talking about Ted Kennedy but I was wrong. I envision T-shirts with the Chavez countenance ala Che springing up amongst the Progressive Left soon.

Further evidence of Saddam working with terrorists:
SADDAM HUSSEIN'S REGIME PROVIDED FINANCIAL support to Abu Sayyaf, the al Qaeda-linked jihadist group founded by Osama bin Laden's brother-in-law in the Philippines in the late 1990s, according to documents captured in postwar Iraq. An eight-page fax dated June 6, 2001, and sent from the Iraqi ambassador in Manila to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Baghdad, provides an update on Abu Sayyaf kidnappings and indicates that the Iraqi regime was providing the group with money to purchase weapons. The Iraqi regime suspended its support--temporarily, it seems--after high-profile kidnappings, including of Americans, focused international attention on the terrorist group. The fax comes from the vast collection of documents recovered in postwar Afghanistan and Iraq. Up to this point, those materials have been kept from the American public. Now the proverbial dam has broken. On March 16, the U.S. government posted on the web 9 documents captured in Iraq, as well as 28 al Qaeda documents that had been released in February. Earlier last week, Foreign Affairs magazine published a lengthy article based on a review of 700 Iraqi documents by analysts with the Institute for Defense Analysis and the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Virginia. Plans for the release of many more documents have been announced. And if the contents of the recently released materials and other documents obtained by The Weekly Standard are any indication, the discussion of the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq is about to get more interesting.
Again I ask, why doesn't the Bush Administration point this out? My theory is the public will realize Bush was correct in removing Saddam after he is impeached and removed from office.
|
|
1 Comments
|
| |
| Prescient parody of mine from a couple of weeks ago. Frightening. |
| 03.18.06 (7:48 am) [edit] |
I was just joking, honest....
Washington D.C.- Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D) Nevada, mistakenly ingested an RU 486 tablet, the controversial "morning after pill" while on vacation in Ghana last year and had to have 7 to 9 feet of intestine forcibly re-inserted through his rectum by a local witch doctor say sources close to the Senator. The Senate Minority leader was quick to blame the Bush Administration, the Bush Tax Cuts, lack of universal health care, the NSA, the CIA, Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, Wolfowitz, Art Bell, No Child Left Behind, the "Republican Culture of Corruption", Halliburton and Jack Abramoff who financed the trip. Boy George was unavailable for comment.

|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Document Dump- Iraq, WMD and Al-Qaeda |
| 03.17.06 (9:44 am) [edit] |
|
This is fascinating stuff...
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/17/06 |
| 03.17.06 (5:36 am) [edit] |
|
Tony Blair, a man with what I believe are referred to in popular parlance as "stones" and a liberal I respect and even though I disagree with him on several issues, might even vote for were he an American.
His own anti-war Labour MPs will be joining a mass demonstration against the continued occupation of Iraq in London on Saturday. They will be calling for the troops to be brought home, but Mr Blair ruled out, "leaving a small minority who want terror and violence to overwhelm the majority who show they are prepared for democracy".
"Yes it is true there are insurgents who are trying to disrupt the democratic process," Mr Blair said. "That is not our responsibility. Our responsibility is to defeat them."
And while I support Bush on many issues this, drives me crazy.
Quick..who is the biggest-spending president in the history of the United States of America? FDR? LBJ? Bill Clinton? Nope, not even close. The answer is the current occupant of the Oval Office, President George Walker Bush. Ronald Reagan must be spinning in his grave at the vast sums of money being spent by the federal government.
It used to be that Republican presidents had an easy out. Constitutionally, Congress appropriates every dollar. They are the ones that did the spending. So if there were big deficits or huge increases in spending, it was easy to blame the Democrats. They ran the show on The Hill for decades. Only now that doesn't wash either.
The Republican majority stormed to power after the 1994 midterm elections and in the decade since, have promptly doubled the size of the federal government. Worse, we now have a president that has happily signed bill after bill spending trillions of dollars...much of it borrowed. No child left behind? No problem! Free pills for old people? Coming right up!
So with these trillions of dollars being borrowed, periodically the United States has to raise its own credit limit. We are now facing the fourth such vote since the younger George Bush took office. The need is to increase the debt limit by another $781 billion, to $9 trillion. That's right...nine trillion dollars, all of it borrowed. Every baby being pushed out from now on owes $30,000 in debt, thanks to the U.S. government.
Limited government? Not this Republican party. Not now, not anymore. Perhaps the Libertarian Party will put down the hemp rope and the Iraq war protest sign long enough to capitalize on the issue
Why not index gov't spending to inflation? I've often said if there were two parties in America, republicans and libertarians, I might be a libertarian, but as long as there are democrats, I'll be a republican. But then again, the libertarian obsession with hemp and protest signs is annoying as well, proving you can't agree with everyone. Well known climatologist and terrorism expert Prince Charles claims global warming is a bigger threat to the world at large than terrorism. Charles I've got someone I'd like you to meet. Take him to one of your breezy, distant castles up north, stuff him in a kilt and let the nightwind caress his increasingly trouble d brow. THE Prince of Wales yesterday claimed that climate change is the world's greatest threat - ahead of terrorism - as he urged industry to become greener.
Wouldn't certain areas of the world become greener with the advent of global warming? Just asking. Bush approval ratings approaching those of Satan, polio and Barney the Purple Dinosaur. But then again most polls said John Kerry was going to breeze into the White House, maybe things would have been different if Karl Rove hadn't planted wolverines in voting booths in strategic districts in Ohio. Moronic trivia between George Clooney and Arianna "Zsa Zsa" Puffington. More Boortz:
United States Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton is comparing the threat of Iran's nuclear weapons pursuit to 9/11. Actually, it's worse. The hijackers on 9/11 didn't have a nuclear bomb. Imagine if they had.
Imagine the damage the 9/11 hijackers could've done if they'd been armed with Global Warming? What if Iran is actually pursuing weaponized Climate Change? Bolton is obviously a warmonger with no sense of perspective, I'm reaching for my hemp rope and protest sign as we speak...Grande Madam Hillrod the Exalted beats Bill into submission on the ports deal. Speaking of that, how long has the United Arab Emirates run ports in Florida? How many terrorist attacks have come through Florida ports? Just asking. Powerline Blog: Iraq's overlooked triumph:
John Poheretz credits Iraq's "political class" with a little-appreciated victory in resisting calls for civil war over the past two weeks, and instead continuing to work out their inevitable conflicts through the political process. Podhoretz makes a fundamental point that some seem to forget: [T]he members of Iraq's political class have chosen hope - chosen to fight their battles at the bargaining table rather than in the streets. By doing so, they are, in fact, offering an example of what democratic institutions are intended to do. They are supposed to replace armed conflict with political negotiation conducted by those who might otherwise take up weapons to get their way. Podhoretz's conclusion is, I think, exactly right: Because of the bombs and the bloodshed, and because many critics are desperate to see President Bush discredited and disgraced, the triumph of the political class in Iraq has been little noted. But if it holds, what has happened in the past two weeks will probably be seen as a turning point - and a validation of George Bush's conviction that Iraq could eventually become a democracy.
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Spring Break-Normal Posting resumes Monday. |
| 03.16.06 (7:03 am) [edit] |
Democratic Underground.com Special Post.
It's things like this that make me support population control. Theocons have no respect to the enviroment, Gawd told them to multiply like rabbits and that protecting the enviroment isn't needed because they think Jebus is gonna come down a rapture them. These people are dangerous and should not be allowed to have more kids then secular people do.
And they say Liberals don't support Police States....(HT Brass Knuckles) I can just hear it now, being blared from "giant monitors everywhere"...."Eat recycled food, it's good for the environment and ok for you."
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/14/06 |
| 03.14.06 (8:08 am) [edit] |
Swinegold's little, cheap publicity stunt goes nowhere, this suprises me I must admit. I fully expected democrats to begin wearing little "censure sensitivity ribbons" all over Capitol Hill and thousands marching on the reflecting pool and screaming slogans. Give 'em time.
Democrats distanced themselves Monday from Wisconsin Sen. Russell Feingold's effort to censure President Bush over domestic spying, preventing a floor vote that could alienate swing voters.
A day of tough, election-year talk between Feingold and Vice President Dick Cheney ended with Senate leaders sending the matter to the Judiciary Committee. "I look forward to a full hearing, debate and vote in committee on this important matter," Feingold said in a statement late Monday. "If the Committee fails to consider the resolution expeditiously, I will ask that there be a vote in the full Senate." Republicans dared Democrats to vote for the proposal.
Another "Troop Withdrawal" showdown vote would be interesting. Liberals, you'll get your little impeachment trial next year, don't worry. It's the only idea I've actually heard from your leaders that I've been able to grasp." V for Bush is Hitler" is opening soon. Many say it's not a Bush bash film but was intended to be a swipe a Thatcher. (A well known Police State Facist). But this reads like it came right out of the mouths of some liberal acquaintance s of mine regarding "Halliburton "W" McBushHitler:"
In "V," Big Brother has taken over Britain. The fascist leader of the country (played by John Hurt) is a Hitlerian tyrant (read damn near any liberal blog for the Hitler riff) who spews invective on giant monitors placed everywhere. Free speech, (Patriot Act, supposedly) homosexuality (gay marriage issue) and artistic expression (republicans hate art ya' know) have been outlawed; citizens must abide by a curfew; and the streets are controlled by secret police (Halliburton, CIA, Cheney's hunting dog). The government has conducted gruesome medical experiments on innocent citizens, with tragic and horrific results (GITMO allegations and Rice Pilaf).
All Hurt has to say is: "You're either with us or against us" and it's Oscar Time. People will read into it what they want I suppose. I just did. Bin Laden salivates in his dank cave. Ralph Peters on realities in Iraq:
During a recent visit to Baghdad, I saw an enormous failure. On the part of our media. The reality in the streets, day after day, bore little resemblance to the sensational claims of civil war and disaster in the headlines. No one with first-hand experience of Iraq would claim the country's in rosy condition, but the situation on the ground is considerably more promising than the American public has been led to believe. Lurid exaggerations and instant myths obscure real, if difficult, progress. I left Baghdad more optimistic than I was before this visit. While cynicism, political bias and the pressure of a 24/7 news cycle accelerate a race to the bottom in reporting, there are good reasons to be soberly hopeful about Iraq's future.
It may be too late Ralph, cynicism and political bias have been spewed from "giant monitors everywhere" for so long that your column (while well done) is but a fart in a tsunami. I don't know why I address these people directly, it's not as if they are going to read it. The French are rioting again. The government must be cutting a couple of months of mandated vacation, Boortz: The rioters were students at dozens of French universities where, by the way, the principle pursuit is a degree in government dependency with a minor in social welfare state management.
Global Warming gases at highest levels ever. They said that last week, or Gore did, from"giant monitors placed everywhere."

|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Day by Day / Blame Bush |
| 03.12.06 (6:55 am) [edit] |
The first two panels are the best. "I'm sorry Mrs. Sheehan, It's not possible to charge these CDs to your son's memory." Hilarious.
Although it's been an incredibly busy week for me, with nary a free minute to even update my blog, I at least made an effort to sit down and watch the Oscars last Sunday night. That’s more than I can say for the rest of America, though. The ratings for this year’s Academy Award ceremonies were the lowest in recorded history, second only to the pilot episode of the Discovery Channel’s Magical Journey Through Phil Donahue’s Digestive Tract. Donahue, of course, insists that the series was sabotaged by right-wing network execs at the behest of the Bush administration. Perhaps so. But with box office numbers continuing to tank as well, one can’t help but wonder if America has somehow lost touch with Hollywood, and how future generations will ever find their way without talented actors and actresses to guide them. There was a time when the American film industry was little more than an instrument for spewing jingoist propaganda. Fascists like John Wayne and Henry Fonda poisoned millions of young minds with their pro-American cowboy filth. But since the 1960’s, Hollywood has become our moral compass. More than just performing monkeys, actors have become the better angels of our nature, leading us along the path of social progress in ways that people with less perfect hair never could. Schindler’s List taught us about the horrors of death camps years before Abu Ghraib and Gitmo. Eddie Murphy’s wonderful performance in Coming to America brought the civil rights movement out of the Alabama swamps and into the American mainstream. Jane Fonda’s brilliant work in Barbarella dared us to question the pointless futility of the Vietnam War. Through the medium of film, Hollywood has been a force for positive change in America - an evil nation with a bloody past, but a promising future if it would simply follow the loving guidance of the Beautiful People. I’m sure Martin, Coretta, Rosa, and the rest of the cast of The Jeffersons would agree.
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/10/06 |
| 03.10.06 (10:24 am) [edit] |
Can't win for losing: If GITMO detainees were allowed to starve it would be considered torture, now force feeding them to keep them alive is as well...
MIAMI - More than 250 physicians from around the world are condemning the Pentagon's practice of force-feeding suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in a letter in today's edition of the British medical journal Lancet. "Fundamental to doctors' responsibilities in attending a hunger striker is the recognition that prisoners have a right to refuse treatment," says the letter, which accuses the U.S. military of violating medical ethics.
Dipshits. Port Deal dead, Mohammed Atta denied the keys to the forklifts to America's ports. China (not a friend) runs 3/4 of the ports on the West Coast. I think President P.T. Barnum pulled that off in the '90s. Media playing games with photocropping, I remember the Bush campaign being accused of subliminally inserting the word "rats" into a commercial in 2000 and had to pull it because of the leftist firestorm. Of course democrats could run Gore campaign ads featuring a white sheet clad Bush participating in the pickup truck dragging death of a Texas black man, that was just fine. This is hardly subliminal...

Poor Dick. Oh well. It's clever. Last week Bush had lower approval numbers than Pol Pot, this week, they're lower than Adolf Hitler. Bush's reluctance to sign Kyoto results in the thawing of Saturn's moon Enceladus, which is now spouting Yellowstone Park like geysers. DNC Chairman Howard Dean was quoted as saying "Even the Sun is angry at Bush's arrogance, I want my country back. YARRGH!"

America's sock drawers, football card collections, diaper pails and recycle bins in danger, Bush to sign renewal of Patriot Act. "V for Bush is a Nazi"? Accordin g to some, "V" is a scathing cutting edge allegory of the "Bush Police State." Roll eyes, sigh wearily, move on. Perspective: Fidel actually runs a real police state. What happened to good ol' apolitical entertainment? I thought "V" looked kinda good, so if I want to see it, I have to wade through 2 hours of schlockey, cheesy, Kossacky democratic underground.com dialogue? Some days I think it would just be easier to be a democrat...Grande Madame HillaryThe Exalted: Fat with Abramoff cash and stinking of sweatshops:
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton has accepted campaign contributions from a Saipan garment-industry tycoon, sometimes described as a sweatshop operator, whose ties to disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff have been part of the lobbying scandal investigation. Newly filed Federal Election Commission records show that the businessman, Willie Tan, last year gave $2,000 to Friends of Hillary, one of the senator's political action committees. Friends of Hillary also accepted $2,000 contributions from Raymond Tan and Siu Lin Tan, family members who are top executives in Willie Tan's businesses. All three contributions were received on September 30, 2005, according to FEC records. Another family member, Josie Tan, who listed her occupation as homemaker, made a $2,000 contribution received on October 2, 2005.
Together, the Tans contributed more to Friends of Hillary than the senator's PAC received, separately, from residents of the states of Hawaii, Mississippi, Nebraska, Vermont, Utah, Kansas, Wyoming, Alaska, Idaho, South Dakota, Montana, or North Dakota, according to the nonpartisan website PoliticalMoneyLine.com
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| This really oughtta work! |
| 03.09.06 (11:36 am) [edit] |
Help fight sexual harassment in the work place....

Mexico's government is using blow-up sex dolls in a new TV campaign against sexual harassment in the workplace. The ads feature dolls, dressed as secretaries and maids, who have to put up with leering and groping from male colleagues. Officials say the aim of the campaign is to make clear that women are not sexual objects.
No. But blow-up dolls are. The gaping maw should be a very effective tool in combating the plague of Mexican machismo...more like an invitation for a fresh display of Mexican machismo! Mexico's "Rosie the Riveter."
|
|
1 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/8/06 |
| 03.08.06 (7:12 am) [edit] |
Delay wins primary: I can just see the liberal message boards and websites now, murmur, murnur, murmur, buzz,buzz, buzz. I wonder what Streisand's website will say? Perhaps the following:
The currupt former Senut Majoritee Leeder Tom Dulay eezily one hiz republican prymarry, we must incyst that voter wholed the republicans reesponsibull in Novembur. Theeze peepull are worse than the thurd rike.
There's nothing quite like a MENSA child to keep us in line. China sentences 16 for coal mine flood. It was probably Bush administration easing of mine regulations that caused the flood in the first place. If we could just learn to run our homes, plants and automobiles harnessing the power of Willie Nelson's yellowing jockey shorts, the world would be a better place. Aging Comedian to block Bush's attempt to give Mohammed Atta the keys to the forklifts at America's ports. Soon we'll all be dead:
Efforts by the White House to hold off legislation challenging a Dubai-owned company's acquisition of operations at six major U.S. ports collapsed yesterday when House Republican leaders agreed to allow a vote next week that could kill the deal.Appropriations Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) will attach legislation to block the deal today to a must-pass emergency spending bill funding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. A House vote on the measure next week will set up a direct confrontation with President Bush, who sternly vowed to veto any bill delaying or stopping Dubai Ports World's purchase of London-based Peninsular & Oriental Steamship Co.
Let's see to it that these guys have more influence over national security issues in November. Ok? If they really were to cut obscure Cold War military programs I might go along with it, but I would rather see that money go back into relevant military programs, plus, I don't trust any group with the word "progressive" in front of it. I've heard Barbra Streisand has psychic powers. Perhaps she should investigate this:
Staff at the century-old Cornwall Arms have reported several encounters with the touchy-feely phantom. Lisa Potter claims to have been spooked several times since taking over the pub six months ago with husband Craig. "It goes very cold and then it feels as if someone is brushing up against you and touching your bottom," the 28-year-old told The Sun newspaper. That's not a bad gig if you're gonna be a ghost.... Iran: Harm and Pain.
|
|
1 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/7/06 |
| 03.07.06 (7:21 am) [edit] |
Bush's failure to sign Kyoto could spawn cosmic storms that are up to 50% stronger say scientists.

Sun-spawned cosmic storms that can play havoc with earthly power grids and orbiting satellites could be 50 percent stronger in the next 11-year solar cycle than in the last one, scientists said on Monday.
White House Spokesman Scott McClellan was unavailable for comment. "The Solar System is at stake" said DNC Chairman Howard Dean, "I want my country and my flag back!" Cuban Paradise: Some GITMO detainees love the deprivation, humiliation and torture of GITMO so much that they don't want to leave, fearing even worse treatment from their respective governments. Rice pilaf, orange glazed chicken and lemon pepper fish, libraries and exercise yards can be addictive trappings I suppose:
Fearing militants or even their own governments, some prisoners at Guantanamo Bay from China, Saudi Arabia and other nations do not want to go home, according to transcripts of hearings at the U.S. prison in Cuba.
Uzbekistan, Yemen, Algeria and Syria are also among the countries to which detainees do not want to return. The inmates have told military tribunals that they or their families could be tortured or killed if they are sent back. President Bush has said the United States transfers detainees to other countries only when it receives assurances that they will not be tortured. Critics say such assurances are useless. The U.S. has released or transferred 267 prisoners and has announced plans to do the same with at least 123 more in the future.
A fate worse than GITMO??? I thought they were being tortured, pissed on and dehumanized in GITMO? I read and heard from many of my elected leaders and guarantors of human liberties the world over that Amerikkka has the status of "World Foremost Torturer"? Just ask Senator Chappaquiddi ck and half the flippin' Democratic Party. New Hamas leader may be targeted by Israel. That won't sit well with Jimmy Carter. Asshead Cindy Sheehan arrested, imagine that. One of Britain's most prominent rock bands urges more studies on Bird Flu which is quickly morphing into Cat Flu. At least they're making good use of their golden years. So it begins. This is a good sign:
BAGHDAD, March 6 -- First they killed the chief of the Naim tribe and his son. Then they killed a top tribal sheik who headed the Fallujah city council. Then they assassinated the leader of the al-Jubur tribe. And now the reported killers of all these men -- al-Qaeda in Iraq, the insurgent group of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi -- have a powerful new enemy. Tribal chiefs in Iraq's western Anbar province and in an area near the northern city of Kirkuk, two regions teeming with insurgents, are vowing to strike back at al-Qaeda in Iraq, a Sunni Arab-led group that is waging war against Sunni tribal leaders who are cooperating with the Iraqi government and the U.S. military. Anbar tribes have formed a militia that has killed 20 insurgents from al-Qaeda in Iraq, leaders said. Separately, more than 300 tribal chiefs, politicians, clerics, security officials and other community leaders met last week in Hawijah, about 35 miles southwest of Kirkuk, and "declared war" on al-Qaeda in Iraq. In a communique, the participants vowed "the shedding of blood" of anyone involved in "sabotage, killings, kidnappings, targeting police and army, attacking the oil and gas pipelines and their transporters, assassinating the religious and tribal figures, technicians, and doctors."
Big fucking suprise here, isn't Vermont the home of DNC Chairman Howard "Hank" Dean? Or is it New Hampshire? I forget:
Newfane, population 1,680, has a resolution calling for the impeachment of President Bush that is bound to trigger a major debate. If it passes, the town will ask Rep. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., to file articles of impeachment.
Don't they have more pressing issues to address? I guess not. Thus confirming my pet theory. (HT Tammy Bruce): F student Babs *r ips Bush as a C student moron:
Spelling errors are as follows: Adminstration,curruption, responsibilty,subpoening, impeachment preceedings,desperatly,wa rrented,adminstration,ous ide, adminstration, dictatoriship and credibilty. You go girl!! * The split in the word rips is beyond my control. So don't try it.
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Barone Column |
| 03.06.06 (6:58 am) [edit] |
|
It would be helpful for the adminstration and their current P.R. problems to have the president explain these matters to Americans rather than columnists, but I digest.. The issue is historical now, but still worth exploring. Why, for two distinct groups of Americans, has it become a matter of conviction held with religious intensity that there cannot have been any relationship between al-Qaida and Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq? One group consists of Democratic politicians who oppose the Bush administration's policy in Iraq. The Minnesota Democratic Party recently protested as "un-American" an ad showing military veterans and their families supporting the president's policies for saying, "Our enemy in Iraq is al-Qaida -- the same terrorists who killed 3,000 Americans on 9-11, the same terrorists from the first World Trade Center bombing, the USS Cole, Madrid, London and many more." The Democrats, unfactually, say that these words "make a connection between Iraq and the 9-11 terrorists attacks and suggest that the war in Iraq will prevent an attack by al-Qaida in America." But of course, the ad is factually correct -- al-Qaida is attacking Americans in Iraq -- and the Minnesota Democratic Party is in no position to guarantee that al-Qaida will not attack America.
The other group consists of intelligence and other career government professionals, many of them Arabists. Case in point: Paul Pillar, CIA national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia from 2000 to 2005, now retired, writing in the most recent Foreign Affairs magazine. The "greatest discrepancy between the administration's public statements and the intelligence community's judgments concerned not WMD (there was indeed a broad consensus that such programs existed), but the relationship between Saddam and al-Qaida. The enormous attention devoted to this subject did not reflect any judgment by intelligence officials that there was or was likely to be anything like the 'alliance' the administration said existed." But the Senate Intelligence Committee report showed that the CIA did obtain evidence of an al-Qaida-Saddam relationship from foreign intelligence and open sources. That's not surprising. CIA Director George Tenet in October 2002 told Congress of "growing indications of a relationship with al-Qaida." And of course evidence of contacts between al-Qaida and Saddam's regime went back to the 1990s and were cited, without murmur of dissent, by President Bill Clinton. So why do these Democrats and these government professionals seem to have such a conviction that there must have been no collaboration between al-Qaida and Saddam? The Democrats fear that more Americans would support Bush and the war effort if they believed there was. The career professionals, with their many years of training in the subtleties of the Middle East, have developed a vested interest in the notion that religious Wahhabis like al-Qaida could never collaborate with a secular tyrant like Saddam. If alliances could be formed across religious lines, what use would all their learning be? The Minnesota Democrats cite the 9-11 commission's report that it found no evidence of "operational" cooperation between al-Qaida and Iraq, although it did find evidence of many contacts. But, as Donald Rumsfeld likes to say, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Neither al-Qaida nor Saddam operated under a Freedom of Information Act. Any collaboration between them on 9-11 would have been kept very secret -- al-Qaida did not want to leave a return address. We do not know that there was such collaboration. But we also do not know that there was not. Going back to the days before our military action in Iraq, it would have been irresponsible for any president to have assumed that there was no relationship between al-Qaida and Iraq, given previous contacts between them and their proven hostility to the United States. President Clinton, responsibly, did not assume that, and neither did President Bush. Nor was there any information that intelligence could have been acquired that could have assured us, with 100 percent certainty, that there was no such relationship. Light on the Saddam regime's collaboration with terrorists will almost certainly be shed by analysis of some 2 million documents captured in Iraq. But, as the intrepid Stephen Hayes of The Weekly Standard has pointed out, almost none of those documents has been translated or released either to the public or to the congressional intelligence committees. It appears that career professionals and, perhaps, political appointees have been blocking release of these documents. Why do their superiors not order them released? Many Americans cling with religious intensity to the notion that somehow Saddam had no terrorist ties -- a notion used to delegitimize our war effort. We should bring the truth, or as much of it as is available, out into the open.
Bush is going to pay a heavy price for his inability (or reluctance) to explain his actions. This time next years the democrats will have both houses and they will be voting to impeach this president, as they (the democrats) have presented no other ideas that I've been able to grasp...
|
|
1 Comments
|
| |
| Great Shot at Hollywood's Biggest Self Absorbed Jackass. |
| 03.05.06 (4:50 pm) [edit] |
|
Why, I don't like the Oscar's is encapsulated in yonder link. It's like having another Democratic National Convention every year. I quit watching them during the '80s when everything was Reagan's fault. As the writer points out, all of his Oscar nominated movies make less than the "Asshat in Question" spends on dental floss.... 
This red carpet frenzy over George Clooney is inexplicable. Truth time: the only movie he’s starred in that’s been successful at the box office was an ensemble piece (Ocean’s Eleven, its sequel Ocean’s Twelve). The $$$ total from his Oscar films barely equals what he spends on tooth floss. Good Night, and Good Luck was historically inaccurate. And he’s not aging gracefully, to put it mildly. (He hasn’t lost that baby weight yet.) Yet Joan Rivers was so in awe of him that she had trouble talking. Or was that the collagen?
Good Night and Good Luck, Asshole!!
|
|
2 Comments
|
| |
| Troops out by '07? / Is force feeding torture? |
| 03.05.06 (6:15 am) [edit] |
|
The left has been demanding this since shortly after most of them (the politicians anyway) voted for it.. Now they'll be calling it "cut and run."
Kos: But a complete bail out a year from now--a full blown cut and run stampede as opposed to a facade draw down timed for the upcoming midterms this November--is consistent with what several military experts on various cable news channels have opined for some time now; that the US can't sustain the troop levels and mix of specialties in Iraq for much longer. Not without a significant change in recruiting numbers or military commitments elsewhere. Or a draft.
No good options there......
From the story: The United States and Britain are planning to pull all their troops out of Iraq by the spring of 2007, two British newspapers reported in their Sunday editions, quoting unnamed senior defense ministry sources. The Sunday Telegraph said the planned pull-out followed an acceptance by the two governments that the presence of foreign troops in Iraq was now a large obstacle to securing peace.
But wait! There's more:
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The U.S. military in Iraq said on Sunday media reports that America and Britain planned to pull all troops out of Iraq by spring 2007 were "completely false," reiterating that there was no timetable for withdrawal. Two British newspapers reported on Sunday that the pull-out plan followed an acceptance by the two governments that the presence of foreign troops in Iraq was now an obstacle to securing peace. But a spokesman for the U.S. military in Iraq reiterated previous statements by U.S. and Iraqi officials that foreign troops would be gradually withdrawn from the country once Iraqi security forces were capable of guaranteeing security.
Hasn't that always been the plan? Personally, I think maybe it is time for the Iraqis to start fighting for themselves...and they are to a lesser degree.
Isn't everyone now claiming that they were tortured in GITMO, if the prisoners were allowed to starve wouldn't that be considered torture as well by many critics?
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Harry "Hank" Reid's Mission Accomplished Moment.../ Now they tell us... |
| 03.04.06 (6:45 am) [edit] |
From the deck of the schooner the SS Teddy, the little bookish Nevada Snot Merchant issued his own Mission Accomplished speech:
"Think of what happened 20 minutes ago in the United States Senate," declared Searchlight's dim bulb to a Democratic audience in December. "We killed the Patriot Act." It turned out to be Harry Reid's "mission accomplished" moment. Yesterday the Patriot Act sprang back to life as the Senate voted 89-10 to reauthorize it. The dissenting votes, all Democrats except nominal independent Jim Jeffords, came mostly from states like Iowa, Vermont and West Virginia, which have few A-list terror targets. Among those voting for the Patriot Act: Harry Reid. Another pro-Patriot Democrat turned out to be ultraliberal Barbara Boxer of California. This Angry Left heartthrob is causing heartache for Daily Kos diarist "awater": I feel so betrayed by her and by the Democratic party in general on this issue that I don't quite know what to do. Why should I even live in this country anymore when those that say they are here to fight for the good--just sell out because they are afraid of appearing to be "soft on terror"? What is the point of voting or being here at all?
No, awater, don't do it! You have so much to live for! Like Russ Feingold, and Pat Leahy, and John Kerry* . . . Oh, wait. Sorry. You're right: On top of this betrayal, there is John Kerry who also voted in support of the Patriot Act. A man that had the incredibly bad taste to ask for donations on this site a day or so go--to then go forward and vote for the Patriot Act--Skull and Bones indeed.
Indeed. But buck up! It turns out Kerry voted against the Patriot Act before he voted for it.
* "A whole bunch of folks in America are concerned about the way the Patriot Act has been applied. . . . People's rights have been abused. . . . Now, I voted for the Patriot Act. . . . Now that's not a flip-flop."--Oct. 8, 2004
Some clarification from the AP:
Clarification: Katrina-Video story ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) _ In a March 1 story, The Associated Press reported that federal disaster officials warned President Bush and his homeland security chief before Hurricane Katrina struck that the storm could breach levees in New Orleans, citing confidential video footage of an Aug. 28 briefing among U.S. officials.
The Army Corps of Engineers considers a breach a hole developing in a levee rather than an overrun. The story should have made clear that Bush was warned about floodwaters overrunning the levees, rather than the levees breaking.
The day before the storm hit, Bush was told there were grave concerns that the levees could be overrun. It wasn't until the next morning, as the storm was hitting, that Michael Brown, then head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, said Bush had inquired about reports of breaches. Bush did not participate in that briefing.
|
|
0 Comments
|
| |
| Bush Video Ordering the Destruction of New Orleans not so Confidential / Jimmy Carter |
| 03.03.06 (7:01 am) [edit] |
|
Like most else regarding this president, the initial breathless "Crime of the Century" style reporting regarding anything he does from Tax Cuts to too much exercise to Iraq is later balanced by calm facts, case in point, the so-called "secret video" in which Bush, (congering dark forces), whips up a hurricane, orders the destruction of New Orleans and the execution of all denizens within it's borders: The AP is calling that tape from a White House briefing on Hurricane Katrina, which caused such a stir when it was released yesterday, "confidential video footage." In fact, most of the August 28 briefing was open to the press and was covered by numerous media outlets including FOX News.
What's more, the entire transcript from the briefing was made available to Congress and to the public last fall.
This of course will largely escape scrutiny:
WASHINGTON — As Hurricane Katrina loomed over the Gulf Coast, federal and state officials agonized over the threat to levees and lives. Hours after the catastrophic storm hit, Louisiana's governor believed New Orleans' crucial floodwalls were still intact. "We keep getting reports in some places that maybe water is coming over the levees," Gov. Kathleen Blanco said shortly after noon on Aug. 29 — the day the storm hit the Gulf coast. "We heard a report unconfirmed, I think, we have not breached the levee," she said on a video of the day's disaster briefing that was obtained Thursday night by The Associated Press. "I think we have not breached the levee at this time." In fact, the National Weather Service received a report of a levee breach and issued a flash-flood warning as early as 9:12 a.m. that day, according to the White House's formal recounting of events the day Katrina struck.
A (D) gets you a pass. Will the Spineless Party jump all over Blanco the way Reid and Nip/Tuck Pelosi excoriated Bush yesterday? Not likely, hence the moniker.... Jimmy Carter: Enema of the State. (HT LGF)
President Carter personally called Secretary of State Rice to try to convince her to reverse her U.N. ambassador’s position on changes to the U.N. Human Rights Commission, the former president recalled yesterday in a talk in which he also criticized President Bush’s Christian bona fides and misstated past American policies on Israel. Mr. Carter said he made a personal promise to ambassadors from Egypt, Pakistan, and Cuba on the U.N. change issue that was undermined by America’s ambassador, John Bolton. “My hope is that when the vote is taken,” he told the Council on Foreign Relations, “the other members will outvote the United States.”
|
|
3 Comments
|
| |
| Review and Comment on the News 3/2/06 |
| 03.02.06 (7:12 am) [edit] |
Jim becomes Jamie: Oh no! Not another one. There seems to be an increase in people having this done. I think we all know whose fault this is....

Bush was warned before Katrina hit. Gosh, so was I, so was The Weather Channel, so were Nagin and Blanco, New Orleans residents knew for decades something like this could happen, is this anything new? Or more of the same old, same old recycled news sliced and diced? Powerline Blog has an opinion on that:
The last thing there was any shortage of in the days before Hurricane Katrina struck was warnings. The news media were full of often-hysterical predictions of death and devastation. The fact that a category 5 hurricane hitting the Gulf coast could cause catastrophic damage was obvious to everyone.
The real question, it seems to me, is one on which the AP article (and, as far as we know, the documents and video footage it is based on) sheds no light: how well prepared were the various local, state and federal agencies, and what was the quality of their response? The AP asserts that "federal officials...were fatally slow to realize they had not mustered enough resources to deal with the unprecedented disaster." But nothing in the article supports that claim. The AP alleges further: In fact, active duty troops weren't dispatched until days after the storm. And many states' National Guards had yet to be deployed to the region despite offers of assistance, and it took days before the Pentagon deployed active-duty personnel to help overwhelmed Guardsmen. This is simply untrue, as the reporters would know if they read Power Line. For a far more thorough and balanced look at the Katrina response, see Popular Mechanics: In fact, the response to Hurricane Katrina was by far the largest--and fastest-rescue effort in U.S. history, with nearly 100,000 emergency personnel arriving on the scene within three days of the storm's landfall. Why don't we just pass a law making everything Bush does an impeachable war crime and have him executed? Let's quit lollygagging around. Sheeit! He didn't ignore the threat, he just thought the government was prepared to handle it. He was wrong. Or was he? Nagin and Blanco will take this to the bank as exoneration. Day-oh! Bush's fault again. Bush lied people died? Maybe not. Youngins': Don't try this at home:
A relative discovered a 23-year-old man dead in the front seat of a car Friday still embracing a dead 17-year-old girl. Their nude bodies were inside a closed garage in the front seat of a 1978 Cutlass. They had apparently been having sex when they were overcome by carbon monoxide, 12 News reported. The medical examiner said the deaths appear accidental.
For those of you who remember the UN Peacekeeper Sex Scandal in The Congo (and how it was swept under the rug) this is not the least bit suprising:
KINSHASA, Democratic Republic of Congo (Reuters) -- Congolese army soldiers fighting alongside U.N. peacekeepers against ethnic militiamen have mutinied, ransacking a U.N. camp in the east and firing on a U.N. helicopter carrying a top commander, U.N. officials said
We had to have rehashed 24/7 coverage of shocking, new Abu Ghraib as the UN story broke... Trouble in Paradise? Bill and Hill at odds over port deal. This may suprise the hard core Bush haters. ZZZZ... Ruth busted sawing logs:
The subject matter was extremely technical, and near the end of the argument Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dozed in her chair. Justices David Souter and Samuel Alito, who flank the 72-year-old, looked at her but did not give her a nudge.
|
|
6 Comments
|
| |
| CBS Pollgate / My Rant |
| 03.01.06 (7:02 am) [edit] |
A recent CBS Poll showing Bush with lower favorability ratings than Pol Pot appears to have been heavily skewed in favor of democrats:
The CBS Poll in question was heavily skewed to the Sensitive Left. 40% of participants were democrats 27% were republicans.
http://newsbusters.org/blog/21" title="http://newsbusters.org/blog/21" target="_blank"http://newsbusters.org/blog/2... http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/poll_bush_ 022706.pdf" title="http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/poll_bush_ 022706.pdf" target="_blank"http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs...
In its classic "fair and balanced" tradition, CBS slanted in favor of Democrats its poll that found Bush has a 34 percent approval rating and a 59 percent disapproval rating, an all-time high for a CBS poll.
On the bottom of the PDF version of the poll (page 18) it says how many Democrats versus Republicans were contacted.
"Total Republicans" contacted: 272 unweighted and 289 weighted.
"Total Democrats" contacted: 409 unweighted and 381 weighted.
"Total Independents" contacted: 337 unweighted and 348 weighted.
Brent Baker also noted how CBS failed to highlight a key portion of its poll on the Feb. 27 "CBS Evening News." 66 percent of respondents thought the media devoted "too much time" to Cheney's hunting accident. Dan Rather has indeed left his mark. Not that Bush's real approval ratings are anything to crow about. This is what happens when you have an entire political movement (democrats) and their fringe elements solely dedicated to seeing to it that as many people as possible believe that this president runs Arab-American Death Camps and wants to turn our nation's security over to the very same Arabs he is placing in death camps, stole two elections, gleefully fills the skies with raw sewage,caused the most devastating hurricane on record by not signing a treaty and then ordered the levees in that area destroyed as a finishing stroke so as to kill more black people, appointed two closet Nazis to the Supreme Court who want to ban art, music, food, water, severly regulate sunsets, Fourth of July picnics and oxygen intake, invented the concept of Saddam having WMD in order to plunder oil reserves to benefit bigoted, fat people in checkered golf pants who shoot human babies in Glad freezer bags during canned hunts on Texas ranches and wants to destroy the last remaining piece of hallowed ground upon which rests the last remaining blade of grass to drill for oil to satiate the appetites of the aforementioned people in checkered golf pants. Of course in order for this campaign to succeed, the target of these accusations has to say nothing in his defense which he has so far managed to do quite successfully. Whew! Got that off my chest. Regular programming will resume...
|
|
4 Comments
|
| |
|
|