How to turn victory into defeat. / UN Clamoring for GITMO closure

(Jaundiced Caterwauling)


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November

My Links
Global Warming Causes Everything
A democrat that doesn't make the veins in my neck explode every time she opens her mouth.
Analog
Baen Books
Brainchild of a Conservative Anomaly
Lesson along the scenic route through purgatory
How Democrats can get away with this bullshit astounds even me!
BBC
Billings Gazette
Big Lizards
Brain Terminal
Colorado Public Radio
Clinton Iraq 1998
Chaos Manor
Democrats vs. Republicans on race issues
Drudge Report
Fox News
Jerry Doyle
Google News
Junk Science.com
Just Barking Mad
Little Green Footballs
The Montana Misanthrope
Montana Politics
Neal Boortz
NO PC Forums
Opinion Journal
Q and O Newsroom
Rabid Sanity
Random Nuclear Strikes
Reference Desk
Sirius
The American Thinker
Thoolou's Lair
VOA News
Victor Davis Hanson
World Tribune
Zombie Hall of Shame (not for the faint of heart)

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



How to turn victory into defeat. / UN Clamoring for GITMO closure
05.19.06 (6:20 am)   [edit]
The weblog  Big Lizards has a post regarding how the media are turning victory into defeat not only in Iraq, but also in Afghanistan as well:

Why does the mainstream media do this? Even the best news is cast in a way that the casual reader will mistake it for dreadful news. At some point, surely some news reporter should rebel and say, "we're here to report history, not rewrite it." Don't they at least feel a little uneasy, deliberately misleading the American people?

I often wonder about this. The journalist community is largely left-liberal, but it's certainly not 100%. And even among the left-liberals, there must be some, a handful, who really do feel some small obligation to the truth.

So where are they? I went looking for the "Moslem Methodists" some months ago; should we send out a searching party for the Justice Journalists, the ones who say "darn the party line, I'm going to tell it like it is!"

Those in the "new media" so called, Talk Radio, the Blogosphere etc., like to refer to the news media as the antique media, the mainstream  media culture (or MSM) and imply that it is waning in influence and maintain the optimistic assertion that people will see through the bias and dismiss it as party line blather and on some levels perhaps they do, but the constant, ceaseless hammering of bad news regarding the War on Terror (particularly Iraq) is perhaps a way of reasserting their dominance. I've observed that while there is a vigorous anti-war movement in this country today, it doesn't seem to be as influential as it was perhaps in the '60s. Maybe this is because many who were in the anti-war movement in the '60s are now the very journalists Mr. ab Hugh is excoriating in his post or at the very least, the children of these activists.

The United Nations (the organization that facilitated Oil for Food with Saddam and turned the entire country of the Democratic Republic of Congo into a systematic rape room) are clamoring for GITMO to be shut down because of the inhumanity of it
all:

 A United Nations panel on torture called on the United States today to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and expressed concern over reports of secret detention centers and of a practice of sending terror suspects to countries with poor human rights records

No more rice pilaf for you Mr. Taliban. As far as poor human rights records,  the UN need look no further than themselves.

 


posted by: Rovin (reply)
post date: 05.19.06 (5:15 am)

"I've observed that while there is a vigorous anti-war movement in this country today, it doesn't seem to be as influential as it was perhaps in the '60s. Maybe this is because many who were in the anti-war movement in the '60s are now the very journalists Mr. ab Hugh is excoriating in his post or at the very least, the children of these activists."

A fair point, but the Viet Nam conflict was going nowhere towards an ending and Americans on both sides of the political spectrum saw no end in site.

Hopefully, when some of our troops begin to come home from the conflicts in Afganistan and Iraq, the Anti-war crowd will lose even more of their "steam".




posted by: ottomanprang (reply)
post date: 05.19.06 (6:03 am)

"Viet Nam conflict was going nowhere towards an ending and Americans on both sides of the political spectrum saw no end in site.

Hopefully, when some of our troops begin to come home from the conflicts in Afganistan and Iraq, the Anti-war crowd will lose even more of their "steam"."

Rovin,I hope you are correct. I know this is cruel and I apoligize for saying this, but I don't know how much longer I can stand the tight close up photos of Cindy Sheehan's man faced, crocodile tear stained countenance and the cheesy posturing of Hollywood activists. Feel free to comment anytime, I like your site. I used to be a blogspotter but I couldn't ever get photos to post, so here I am....


Your Name:


Your Comment: